Translation for " git status -short" which is essentially the same, but Use hardcoded strings when -porcelain is used, but keep the gettext
(ahead, behind, gone), and used gettext to translate the string. " git status -branch -porcelain" displays the status of the branch Note: git status -porcelain has just been made a bit more reliable with commit 7a76c28, for git 1.9.2 (April 2014), by Matthieu Moy moy) disable translation when -porcelain is used Would it be ok, in the long run, to rely on git log, or should I use a "plumbing" command instead? If [ $(git status -porcelain | wc -l) != "0" \ So my question is: what do I need to add to the original script to also identify when the repo has unpushed changes? In particular, would this be a correct approach? #!/bin/bash Nothing to commit, working directory clean # (use "git push" to publish your local commits) # Your branch is ahead of 'origin/master' by 1 commit. Here is an example math-hl]$ git status math-hl]$ git status
In particular, git status will report unpushed changes, while git status -porcelain will not. Unfortunately git status -porcelain and git status do not do exactly the same thing. The idea behind that answer was to emulate what the programmer would do: run git status and then examine the output. The answer I adopted from that discussion was the following: #!/bin/sh
#Git status porcelain how to
An earlier question resulted in some ideas on how to check whether your Git repo contains a dirty index or untracked files.
0 kommentar(er)
